The following is an open letter sent to the following New York State and United States representatives on Martin Luther King Jr. Day on January 19, 2015.
Dear Chairman Fagan, County Executive Brooks, Senator Gillibrand, Senator Schumer, Governor Cuomo, and President Obama,
My name is David Sanchez. I grew up in Liverpool, NY, half a mile from Onondaga Lake, one of the most polluted lakes in the country. As a child, I remember being told stories about the lake that was, once full of beaches and merry go rounds. On days with high winds, these stories sounded especially fantastical as dead fish and stomach turning smells surfaced from the water. I’m writing this letter in hopes that you and I can be part of preventing the creation of another story of a lake “that was.”
New York State (NYS) has made history by banning hydraulic-fracturing to avoid the environmental degradation that states like Texas, Colorado, North Dakota and Pennsylvania have only begun to see. As we learn more about the waste being shipped from Pennsylvania to be processed in NYS and Crestwood Midstream’s potentially explosive plans to store methane and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) in the salt caverns along Seneca Lake, it’s clear that the residents and elected officials of our state need to move further to take a stand to guarantee our land is livable for all who call it home for generations to come.
Today on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, I’m joining the group of over 180 New Yorkers and thousands internationally who are putting their careers, bodies and consciouses on the line to say no to energy practices that put ours and future lives in danger. As I commit civil disobedience today as a Seneca Lake Defender, I’ll remember King’s words saying “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him [sic] is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law.” Do know that on the other side of this decisive ‘no’ lives a passionate commitment to be apart of shifts of the consumption of the finite resources on our only planet. Climate change, the increase in population, and urbanization offers New York and the United States the opportunity to set a global precedent in shifting to sustainable resources. We need to act now.
I’m asking your direct support on the following issues: Create a ban on storage of methane and LPG gas in unsafe facilities and on shipment of fracking waste to NYS waste plants. Investigate the barring of the public from Reading Town Court hearings. Review and extend the appeal of the September 30, 2014 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ruling allowing Crestwood to store methane and LPG at Seneca Lake. Support policies to shift to sustainable energy and transport systems for NYS. Accelerate local, state and national policies to support the growth of local food and economic systems that make adjusting to climate change viable.
Support New Yorkers by supporting the dedicated people standing by the now pristine Seneca Lake that is.
Looking towards the future,
As defined on the Positive Peace Warrior Network website, Kingian Nonviolence is “a philosophy and methodology that provides the knowledge, skills, and motivation necessary for people to pursue peaceful strategies for solving personal and community problems.” Formulated by Dr. Bernard Lafayette and David Jehnsen, Kingian Nonviolence is one of the foundational philosophies of nonviolence the Gandhi Institute utilizes to teach community members about the significance of nonviolence to the construction of a just, equitable world.
Grounded in six principles, the second principle of Kingian Nonviolence reads “The Beloved Community is the Framework for the Future”, with the beloved community essentially being “…a world where people of all races, genders, cultures and generations are living in unity with each other.”.
While I wholeheartedly agree with the radical humanists sentiments conveyed by the second principle, there is a, perhaps intentional, vaguery encircling the second principle’s proposed method for the assembling of beloved community.
Amidst this vaguery, I offer radical Black feminism, in both theory and action, as a method by which beloved communities may blossom. Unlike the feminisms deployed by various groups of white women uncritical of how white supremacy operates in their lives, also known as “white feminism”, radical Black feminism sprang from the minds of various Black women dissatisfied with the racism within the, often very white, women’s movements and the sexism within male-led organizations advocating “Black Power”.
By taking into consideration the various intersections in which systems of domination operate, radical Black feminists broke ground in liberatory struggle by offering a framework which rejected narrow-minded thinking in relation to identity, paving way for nuanced scrutinizations of the world’s social ills, especially in reference to the plight of Black women.
In her piece entitled Resting in Gardens, Battling in Deserts1, humanities and political science professor of Williams College, Joy James, gives both historical context to radical Black feminist thought and action, as well as a sampling of projects taken up by those who operate from the radical Black feminist banner. From actions taken to dismantling military and prison industrial complexes, to challenging global state governments to honor human rights law, James’ article is a non-exhaustive overview of radical Black feminist agendas.
One may argue that these agendas may be, and are often, acted out detached from a radical Black feminist framework. However, agendas which do not operate from an anti-racist, feminist framework are extremely likely to reproduce violence upon people marginalized because of race and/or gender; these people often being Black women and other women of color.
bell hooks, the widely acclaimed Black feminist scholar, coined the term imperialist white supremacist capitalist patriarchy in order to give language to the ever-present, interlocking systems of domination undergirding our society. And, as suggested by both the second principle of Kingian Nonviolence and The Combahee River Collective’s statement on radical Black feminism, when one system of domination is operating, more are never far behind.
The expansive, and ever expanding, range of ideas grappled with by radical Black feminist thought, from sexuality to art, offers a social justice framework capable of considering the predicaments of the multiply marginalized among us; a methodology established for incorporating the needs of the most downtrodden into the blueprint for a transformed society.
So, here, I implore the reader to study the works of radical Black feminists such as Audre Lorde, Angela Davis, June Jordan, bell hooks, Patricia Hill Collins, Michele Wallace, Barbara Smith, Michelle Cliff, Anna Julia Cooper, and countless others. Support organizations that operate from a radical Black feminist framework, such as the Black Youth Project 100, the Audre Lorde Project, or Black Girl Dangerous.
The radical humanism inherent to radical Black feminism often goes misunderstood, or outright disregarded. If we are to build beloved communities of integrity, radical Black feminism cannot be ignored. “Liberation” means nothing if it doesn’t apply to everyone.
1. James, Joy. “Resting in Gardens, Battling in Deserts: Black Women’s Activism.” Race and Resistance: African Americans in the 21st Century. (Ed. Herb Boyd. Cambridge: Southend Press, 2002.) 67-77. Print
We’ve had lots of students reach out to us recently as part of National History Day. Here’s one Q&A exchange between a student and Gandhi director Kit Miller.
1. What do you think India would be like if Gandhi hadn’t existed?
It’s hard to say. If a violent war to kick the British out after 200 plus years of colonial rule had occurred, in such an unstable region of the planet because of its political and economic value to global powers, anything could have happened.
2. How did Gandhi impact the world?
Gandhi’s 20 plus years of work in S Africa definitely had a major effect on that country and the amazing work of Mandela and countless others in ending apartheid in that country as peacefully as they did. Globally the emergence of nonviolence as a form of political expression was supported by Gandhi’s qualities as a human being. Because he lived nonviolence, and didn’t just use it as a means of political change, his life still matters tremendously as a source of inspiration to people of many nationalities and faith backgrounds.
3. What do you think Gandhi’s main leadership qualities were?
Humility, curiosity, perseverance and faith.
4. If you were in Gandhi’s shoes, what choices would you’ve done differently?
Again, hard to say. I’m not a man of a certain religion and nationality who was born in 1869! However a couple of things stand out. I think I would have tried to have more compassion for my own family, wife and sons, who were so affected by the life choices I was making. Gandhi’s relationship especially to his oldest son Harilal was a source of pain for the family for years and I wish it could have somehow been handled differently. The other thing, if I could go back in a time machine, would have been to somehow prevent the ‘divide and conquer’ efforts that the British successfully made between Hindus and Muslims that led to the bloody partition of India into Pakistan.
5. Which speech of Gandhi’s really moved people the most and how?
I’m not sure. He gave thousands of talks over the course of his decades of work, which is amazing given that he was painfully shy as a young person. I think what suited him more was his years of writing and the various journals and newspapers that he started and worked on. More than public talks, that was his major means of communicating his radical ideals to the masses.
6. How did Gandhi inspire you to become an expert on nonviolence?
I don’t think of myself as an expert on nonviolence but as a student who tries to use her life to submit to both the discipline and the structure of nonviolent ideals. Over time this has led to many changes in my life, both internally and in how I spend the resources of my time and money. Gandhi’s life and message have inspired me to take this up as a life-long path.
7. What do you think India would be like currently if India hadn’t split up into two?
I believe it could be more prosperous as millions and millions of dollars have been pumped into the militarys of India and Pakistan to defend borders, which impoverishes both countries, both materially as well as spiritually. If the extraordinary nonviolent leadership of one of Gandhi’s colleagues, Khan Ghaffar Khan, had been available to India after the British left and Gandhi was assassinated, I think it could have had an important effect on the world. Khan was Muslim and from the Northwest Territories so was automatically considered to be part of the new country of Pakistan. However, after partition occurred, he was incarcerated for decades by Pakistan for espousing Gandhian principles. What would global politics look like now if a Muslim man could have become as globally recognized as standing for nonviolence as Dr. King later became? I wonder about that and how it could have affected US choices even today.
8. How did Gandhi affect lives today?
In a survey of CEOS a few years ago, Gandhi was listed as one of the top 5 leaders of all time. He’s recognized as an innovator and someone who, without lots of money, or an army, or a government position, changed the course of human events. I think and hope that human beings will study and more importantly try to emulate his life for years to come. His thinking about sustainability and the importance of local economies was visionary and entirely relevant to today’s issues.
9. What are some key events that made Gandhi “The Father of Our Country” and how?
Gandhi’s life and contribution rightfully have been a source of pride for Indian people for decades. His life and message has inspired many efforts and projects on the grassroots level in India.
10. How was Martin Luther King Jr.a big part of Gandhi’s legacy?
Dr. King demonstrated the universality of nonviolence through grounding it in Christianity and through supporting its flowering in a different time and culture. The work of King and his many, many colleagues, who deserve to be equally well-known in many ways, was creative. They didn’t try to copy what happened in India, they made it their own. Like Gandhi, King espoused a lived practice of nonviolence, not just the use of nonviolence as a political tool. If more people from the civil rights era had truly taken up nonviolence as a living practice, I think it would have had a major positive effect on the US over time that would be felt today. I feel sad that King’s life was cut short and that he did not have the opportunity to develop this approach for decades like Gandhi and Khan did.
by Kevin Varney
I’m on the other side of the world and I’m watching reactions to the Ferguson grand jury decision unfold over social media…and I’ve been struck by something in the nature of the statuses, articles, or photos shared by my facebook friends back home.
Each and every one of them reflect that person’s own experience in America. It’s fairly obvious to me who’s liberal, who’s conservative. I can tell who has experienced some form of racism, and I can tell who has been pretty sheltered from it. From my conservative friends, I often see a certain color-blindness and desire to uphold “personal responsibility” as the issue. They sincerely believe, with all their heart, that America is the same for everyone as long as you work hard and act respectably.
Now, I’m not a conservative, I’m definitely more progressive on most social and fiscal issues, but I have always admired that very basic ideology underlying conservative thought – That anything is possible if you work hard. Doesn’t matter what you look like, or where you started from. It’s all about where you want to go. It hearkens to an incredibly idealistic view of our country, which I sincerely want to believe in. But I think that where this way of thinking fails is in its inability to reconcile certain realities in our country’s past and present which go against this view of America.
There are very real harsh realities in our country. To put it in the most basic terms, life is different for people based on their background. If you’re black or brown or yellow, it’s different than if you’re white. If you’re a woman, life is different than if you’re a man. If you’re poor, it’s different than if you were rich. If you identify as LGBTQ, life is different than if you identify as straight. If you’re an immigrant, it’s different than if you were born here.
For young men of color, especially black men, these difficulties are all too real. These difficulties are institutionalized and present at every level of our society. It doesn’t matter how you dress, what degree of education you have, etc…Black men are always looked at with a level of suspicion and distrust, especially by law enforcement. And then, when things go wrong, the victims are blamed. As if their way of dress or demeanor was somehow responsible for the misguided perceptions of the perpetrator. This is wrong and it needs to change.
There’s something profoundly wrong in our national dialogue when all I see or hear is the dehumanization of the “other side.” This mentality must stop.
We must try to understand the other side. We need to stop vilifying the anger that is displayed at the verdict of the Ferguson case. There is a reason that this incredible anger exists.
To my friends (especially my white and non-black friends), who espouse the ideals of personal responsibility and to those that sincerely doubt the prevalence of racism in our society- instead of just writing off the peaceful protesters or even the violent rioters, please try and understand what these people are feeling. There’s a reason that so much emotion is behind this whole case. It’s opened all kinds of wounds in America that have long been simmering beneath the surface.
It is time for us to embrace true equality in America. And true equality doesn’t just come into existence by pretending that it’s here. We must all work for it. And we start that important work with a little empathy for people that are different from us.
~Kevin Varney is a former intern at Gandhi
by Erin Thompson
The Gandhi Institute has been working closely with the Industry Juvenile Detention Center in Rush, N.Y. to establish a Nonviolence Club at that facility. Recently the Institute brought senior Kingian Nonviolence trainer Jonathan “Globe” Lewis to Rochester in order for him to conduct a two-day nonviolence workshop (October 3rd and 4th). The overlapped timing of these two endeavors created a small window of opportunity – on Thursday, October 2nd, which is Gandhi’s birthday – in which to introduce Jonathan and the Industry youth to each other. The results were equal parts sobering and heartwarming.
The afternoon at Industry started with our small group being buzzed through the double doors of the heavy, barbed wire-topped gate. Institute Director Kit, interns Al and Hoody, Globe and I all patted ourselves down to ensure we weren’t carrying any restricted items. Despite Industry being categorized as a “limited secure” facility, the reinforced doors, metal detectors, loops of barbed wire and curt demeanor of the Industry personnel all smacked of law and order, and an undercurrent of tension permeated the somber halls.
Once we were processed in, we met with a friendly face in Youth Division Aide Debrine Williams, who has worked extensively with the Gandhi Institute in the past. Debrine has clearly taken her Industry charges under her wing, referring to them as her “nephews.” Debrine’s group was the first of three sets of young males to file into the auditorium where the session with Globe was to take place. As the young men took their seats, they eyed us warily, probably trying to find the common denominator in our motley cast of characters. Globe was outfitted in an electric green bubble vest, white tee shirt, loose jeans, sneakers and baseball cap. The appearance of the rest of us ran the gamut: from shaved heads, to twists, to flowing hair; from skinny jeans to baggy khakis. Black, white, female, male.
By the time all the participants arrived, a good 15 minutes of the one-hour time slot we negotiated for was behind us. I made some brief introductory remarks and quickly turned over the program to Globe.
A practitioner of Kingian Nonviolence strives to suspend snap judgments. Globe, as the hip-hop attired counterpart of his conservatively draped mentor Dr. Bernard Lafayette, brings this point to a head. Globe’s power lies not only in his obvious mastery of the concepts he presents, but in his ability to meet his audience “where they’re at.” For this particular group of young men, this meant speaking directly to the decisions they made which led to their incarceration, and to the central role each of them plays in determining the trajectory of the rest of their lives. The stark reality is that for some time into the future, these guys (ages 12 – 17) are going to be confined together and unable to exercise control over many elements of their lives that those of us on the outside take for granted. Globe proposed the adoption of a nonviolent mindset as a practical alternative to feeding into the destructive anger and aggression that can accompany incarceration. Do the time affirmatively, and don’t let the time do you.Emerge from within these confining walls with a stronger sense of self than when you went in. Your life matters! Without any air of judgment, personal responsibility and mindfulness were put forth as the foundations of purposeful living and community building.
Throughout the session, Globe made his way through the aisles handing over the microphone to those with something to say. The fellas quickly got over any initial shyness and many shared stories of their ongoing struggles and successes. They encouraged each other to avoid falling in with those who are fixated on negativity. They spoke about how they look forward to being out in the world, and putting their lives back together. One young man asked about how he could learn more about nonviolence training.
The short period of time we had with the young men of Industry felt both tragic and triumphant. If an ongoing Nonviolence Club is established, I am certain that good things will come of it. What is daunting is the recognition of societal norms which function to keep places like Industry at maximum capacity. The Industry session was humbling, and reinforced my appreciation for the work my colleagues at the Gandhi Institute do on a daily basis.
During dire times, humans seem to have a natural inclination toward the arts as a mechanism to relieve the pressure of feelings otherwise incommutable. Whether we’re referring to the practices of the ancients to perform dance and song for their gods in exchange for blessings, or the sorrow songs passionately sung by enslaved Black people to convey their shackled inner lives and yearnings for freedom, art has been the medium people have turned to time and time again to give substance to that which can’t be said.
However, the so-called ‘cultural elite’, those who live under the impression that legitimate art is only that which is hung in the galleries of lavish neighborhoods, where hundred dollar wines flow like water. The art of this privileged few tries its best to erase the lives of the majority, giving special apathy to those who live on the margins. This is art produced under the delusion of plush fantasy, built upon others’ backs.
Despite the efforts of the upper classes to discourage the production of art that speaks to radically different experiences, where various societal structures are unabashedly named as the forces that cause suffering and notions of taboo are simply done away with. These works of art, where various societal structures are unabashedly identified as forces that cause suffering, have been essential components to movements for social justice; from Harlem Renaissance artists boldly proclaiming that “We younger Negro artists who create now intend to express our individual dark-skinned selves without fear or shame.” , to writers living during the Civil Rights/Black Power era, such as Lorraine Hansberry, who actively chose to depict Black people’s lives without relying upon misinformed notions of Black humanity to give their works zest. Arts, in all of its manifestations, have pulled movements for change in directions that would have otherwise been inaccessible, because works of art constructed with an abundance of integrity and technical skill can activate people’s imaginations in ways that speeches and lectures can’t.
To not give those artists committed to liberatory struggle as well as the production of quality works of art credit is detriment to cultivating a world where people are able to creatively live as their entire selves. Artists dedicated to these missions are extremely reliable for capturing experiences that would otherwise decay into vague recollections and dust. To deny the contributions of these artists is to erase skillful encapsulations of human reaction to social phenomena.
This said, when eighteen year-old Michael Brown was slain in Ferguson, Missouri by Ferguson Police Department officer Darren Wilson on August 9th, the outcry of the artists was imbued with a wave of indignant pain only the most tragic social phenomena are capable of triggering. This tragedy, within the context of post-Zimmerman America and continued further violence directed toward Black youth,such as Renisha McBride, was met with a global outpouring of art.
Artists of all disciplines released wave after wave of material in the weeks following Brown’s killing and the community led protests against the FPD’s refusal to penalize Officer Wilson for his actions as well as general lack of respect for Brown and his family. A statement of solidarity, published on Red Wedge Magazine’s website,signed by artists across the country and abroad, serves as a microcosm of the energy artists have channeled into producing art which grapples with the reality that the state deems Black lives disposable.
Beginning with the writers, a poem entitled not an elegy for Michael Brown, by award winning poet Danez Smith, begins with the line, “I am sick of writing this poem”, and goes on to question the masses commitment to justice for Brown and other slain Black youth. In this same literary vein, various DC-area poets contributed to the development of Dear Ferguson – A DC Community Poem, searingly read by internationally renowned DC based spoken word artist Pages Matam. Both poems add compelling perspectives and fresh language to the discourse surrounding the events continuing to erupt in Ferguson.
In Philadelphia’s iconic LOVE park, two actors, Lee Edward Colston and Keith Wallace recreated Brown’s last moments right in front of the park’s eponymous ‘LOVE’ sculpture. By having Wallace wear a white T-shirt with holes resembling bloodied gunshot wounds torn into the back while lying face down and motionless for an hour, the two artists received mixed messages from spectators; from those in respectful awe of the artists’ creativity to those who degraded the pieces message to pure spectacle by having their portraits taken in front of Wallace’s still body.
Within the musical realm, a deluge of tracks have been released by artists in various genres and all levels of fame. Releasing an intensely emotional track alongside a very vulnerable statement on the nature of living as a Black man in America, rapper J. Cole’s track Be Free is a somber conveyance of a simple desire for a liberty most African-American’s will never experience in today’s world. Getting to the root of the Ferguson community’s, and by extension all Black people engaged in struggle against the state, frustration, Lauryn Hill unveiled the melancholy Black Rage. Tenderly singing lines such as, “Black rage is founded on two-thirds a person”, a reference to theDred Scott Case of 1857, Hill centers the history of Black people being dehumanized, abused, and exploited, revealing the historical context of the Ferguson community’s rage.
And, although met with some backlash by local police departments, visual artists, such as University of Missouri – St. Louis student Howard Barry, have not stood idly by as their counterparts have been feverishly creating. From photographs depicting uncensored police brutality against Ferguson protesters to an upcoming exhibition of the works of two-hundred and fifty St. Louis area artists, the visual arts have been essential in tugging at people’s consciences, using the universal language of imagery.
In the city of Ferguson itself, a Before I Die wall was constructed by a group of teachers in hopes that the community would use the artpiece to support their efforts in imagining a future without the realities that led to Michael Brown’s death. And, in their calls for acts of solidarity, the people of Ferguson requested those capable of organizing street theatre performances join them on the ground, hinting at an abundance of artwork created, and in production, by Ferguson community members themselves.
Painter Cbabi Bayoc told Art in America, “…a lot of art will come of this”, in reference to the aforementioned events of this summer, and we have all the reason to believe him.
There is a force in our society, one that has come to manifest itself in countless forms, that many people are hesitant to name as a detriment to their lives. Most who dare to speak against this force, to utter the word that names it, are waved away as sentimental dunces, are charged with promoting lofty idealisms and are thereafter banished to society’s dim margins. Very few wish to acknowledge the hideous commonness of this force in its many manifestations.
That force’s name, that persistent presence, that scourge of pain, and fear, and shame, is ‘violence’. When most people hear the word ‘violence’, memories of physical brutality may replay in their minds. A vicious swat by an older sibling, a sailing fist cracked across a jaw, a bloodcurdling assault by an anonymous assailant. Although many are quick to decry the most intimate aspects of physical violence where it rears its head, the majority of those are also unwilling, or incapable, to enact healing work against those lingering traumas associated with having one’s body ravaged at another’s hands. Of course, they themselves are not to blame.
Ours is a society that seeks to, at every turn, devalue the significance of its citizens interior lives. We are encouraged to neglect our inner lives; religious practices are derided as narrow-minded and uncouth within increasingly secularizing cultural spheres, those who seek out therapists are snickered at in secret, and all who deeply ponder about human nature are handled with suspicion and apprehension. For most people, extended silences and solitude allow sinister things to bubble up to their conscious, and no one has taught them to be at peace with these haunts. Too many flee their demons by embracing addictions. Too many lack skills that would disallow past traumas to rend their spirits. Too many have been coaxed into allowing their interior lives to decay.
Yet, the state of people’s interior lives can never be divorced from the surrounding sociopolitical and sociocultural environments in which they’ve developed. Is it not violence when ours is a society that devalues the humanity of female-bodied people to no more than their sexual organs, their bodies violated time and time again, their appeals for justice ignored just as often? When young children, of all colors, point to dolls of darker skin and Afro-features as inherently nefarious? When indigenous voices of various tones seeking sovereignty over ancestral lands are constantly ignored and, instead, have the miniscule wedges of Earth they’ve been murdered onto bombarded with toxic wastes? When people of all races lacking in economic resources must either subsist on foodstuffs that poison their bodies, or nothing? What world do we inhabit where these realities often go acknowledged and, yet, unmanaged; where the suffering of another is commonly associated with a character flaw on the individual’s part and not symptomatic of systems of domination our society was built, and tragically thrives, upon?
Any path toward nonviolence that fails to acknowledge and work against physical, non-physical, and structural manifestations of violence is inherently lacking in depth. Any paths toward nonviolence lacking in strategies for justice and healing are underdeveloped. We are past the era where the division between mind, body, and spirit can be justifiably imposed upon the masses. We are past the point of presenting the populace with sparkling words in hopes that they will suffice for the arduous labor of transforming our world into one where harmony reigns.
Comprehensive nonviolent ideologies must offer tactics and solutions to address the historical roots and contemporary manifestations of evil, blatant and insidious. Nonviolence is only authentic when the livelihoods of all persons are accounted for, when voices resounding at the margins become centered and their requests heeded. Ultimately, the nonviolent path is one that aims for peace. However, peace will never exist without justice. Justice for everyone.
By Kit Miller
Sunday, September 21 was the International Day of Nonviolence. It was a holy privilege to pray, meditate and bear witness on 59th Avenue in New York City. Hundreds of thousands from the Peoples’ Climate Gathering streamed past
60 of us who participated in an Earth Vigil gathering organized by the Lost Bird Project and the Rochester Zen Center with support from the Gandhi Institute. Our group arrived the day before (Saturday) and meditated for hours just past where the march officially commenced, on a knoll in Central Park next to the street. We returned after sleeping on the floors of an empty building in Brooklyn and resumed the meditation by 7 am, though some of us also joined a nearby sunrise gathering of indigenous leaders from throughout N America who gathered to pray for the success of the march and for planetary healing.
Those who all too often come last in our society were first as hundreds of youth of color and indigenous peoples started the river of humanity that flowed past for hours. Sitting in meditation, bearing witness, my tears also flowed for hours. The beauty and the creativity of our species represented there felt like medicine. The variety of issues represented-mountaintop removal, extinctions, rising CO2, fracking, economic injustice and many more-broke my heart open.
Hundreds of thousands raised their voices while millions worldwide watched, marched at home and hoped.It feels too early to say what is different now, though the Rockefeller family’s announcement to divest from fossil fuels feels like a good start. Let’s join them in changing the business as usual mindset. Thousands of individual acts of any size or significance, when gathered together as they were on Sunday,represent a mighty force.
I think in terms of my personal growth and trying to figure out how I want to contribute to the world, it was very inspiring for me to get to work and connect with people who genuinely have passion for bettering their communities. I really admired the way that everyone took time to share their ideas and grow in their knowledge as well as the openness with which they shared their experiences and views with me. Additionally, it was also inspiring to see the model of staying small and partnering with individuals and community groups. This was a powerful example of creating change through collaboration and community. Seeing people so compassionate and devoted to improving the lives of others and correcting perceived injustice was encouraging for me as I think about the type of career decisions I’m going to have to make in the next few years.
I also enjoyed learning a bit about Nonviolent Communication. Though from my own spiritual background there were certain things that I didn’t necessarily accept, I think learning about needs, making requests, and some of the mindfulness and self awareness tools opened me up to new ways to connect with my desires and passions. One aspect of nonviolence that particularly resonated with me was attacking evil rather than people doing evil, particularly as it pertains to restorative justice and creating constructive, positive systems and institutions rather than merely taking away unjust ones.
The most impactful experience was going into the schools and working with the youth because the impact that the clubs are having was so evident. It was also really interesting to observe the differences in environments between the suburban and urban schools and the different challenges and benefits that both environments foster. I learned a lot from watching Shannon and Anna about facilitating especially when the group is a energetic and rambunctious one.
I am also grateful for some of the skills I was able to develop by spending time at the Gandhi Institute. Though it may sound trivial, learning how to work productively with others to coordinate different projects in a work environment was something I was exposed to for the first time. Learning about all the different aspects of program evaluation was also insightful. I really enjoyed the openness and freedom that you provided for me to work with.
Overall, I want to thank you for this opportunity. I really appreciate everyone at the Institute being so welcoming and open as well as valuing any contributions I was able to make.
I am inspired by the work you are doing and would love to stay connected to the Institute through volunteering during the summer or any other assistance I can provide.
by guest contributor Sarita Benesch
Peter Jemison’s contact with nature is one without hesitancy, cruelness, or barriers. Perhaps his communicative abilities stem from his membership of the Heron clan of the Seneca Nation or his artistic touch, but regardless, it’s uncommon in the twenty first century. During his talk at the Gandhi Institute, he spoke of the undeniable importance between humans and their environment.
Since the beginning of civilization, humans have depended on nature. Ancient Sumerians lived in harmony with the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, the ancient Egyptians were in touch with the Nile River, and even the Indus Valley civilizations learned to appreciate the unpredictable monsoons. The moment humans learned how to control nature, the interaction between the two became infinitely more complicated. At first, the increased complexity was not negative. In fact, irrigation techniques or terracing to control the water flow aided the common person and allowed for easy access to a vital resource, without harming the resource itself. At what point did human’s control of nature become detrimental to society? When instead of modifying nature, we started destroying it. The process occurred gradually, until the point we find ourselves today; almost complete disregard for nature and living things.
If everyone, including myself, were to quite literally stop and smell the roses, we would quickly become more aware of our surroundings. With awareness inherently comes mindfulness, kindness, and irreplaceable understanding of life. It is my hope that even as heavy industry keeps expanding and technology becomes more prevalent, the human race can continue to appreciate the value of untouched nature. Knowing where the closest herbal medicine is located is just as, if not more, important than being able to find a local wifi Hot-Spot.
Sarita Benesch is a student at Brighton High School who volunteers weekly at the Gandhi Institute.
- January 31, 2015 12:00 pmAlternatives to Violence Project Mini Workshop!
- February 4, 2015 7:00 pmFilm Screening and Discussion:Black Power Mixtape
- February 11, 2015 7:00 pmFilm Screening and Discussion: Muyurangabo
- February 18, 2015 7:00 pmFilm Screening and Disscussion: Gaslands2
- February 19, 2015 6:00 pmRace Dialogues
- How One Gandhi Staff Spent MLK Day: Fracking & Seneca Lake January 22, 2015
- Beloved Community: Radical Black Feminism as a Framework for the Future January 20, 2015
- Gandhian History Discussion January 5, 2015